|Subject:||Docs recommend Badger as a replacement instead of Moose/etc.|
|Date:||Wed, 8 Feb 2012 16:54:08 +0000|
|To:||bugs-Class-Base [...] rt.cpan.org|
|From:||Matt S Trout <mst [...] shadowcat.co.uk>|
Since nobody to my knowledge other than the author uses Badger, and the original justification for Badger was a mistaken belief that Moose would break compatibility as the Perl6 spec changed (which ABW then dishonestly retconned 1984-style in the documentation rather than make it clear that his entire reason for developing it was a mistake, and that the only reason for continuing was inertia on his part), Class::Base should recommend Moose/Moo/Mo instead as a usable replacement object system. -- Matt S Trout - Shadowcat Systems - Perl consulting with a commit bit and a clueEmail me now on mst (at) shadowcat.co.uk and let's chat about how our Catalyst commercial support, training and consultancy packages could help your team.