Skip Menu |
 

This queue is for tickets about the Module-Signature CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 68150
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: Module-Signature

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: trs [...] bestpractical.com
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: 0.67 incorrectly verifies SIGNATURE files generated by 0.66
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 12:20:58 -0400
To: bug-Module-Signature [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Thomas Sibley <trs [...] bestpractical.com>
Download (untitled) / with headers
text/plain 355b
It seems like some SHAs are missing when verifying the 0.66 signature file with 0.67. I replicated the problem locally using the Jifty 1.10228 tarball. Downgrading to 0.66 fixed the problem. See this bug report: https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=68141 The relevant output: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Attachment/WithHeaders/484936 Thomas
Download (untitled) / with headers
text/plain 125b
I have prepared a 0.67_01: https://github.com/andk/module-signature It's waiting for review, so if you can, give it a try.
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #68150] 0.67 incorrectly verifies SIGNATURE files generated by 0.66
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 11:59:02 -0400
To: bug-Module-Signature [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Thomas Sibley <trs [...] bestpractical.com>
Download (untitled) / with headers
text/plain 262b
On 05/12/2011 10:08 PM, Andreas Koenig via RT wrote: Show quoted text
> I have prepared a 0.67_01: > > https://github.com/andk/module-signature > > It's waiting for review, so if you can, give it a try.
0.68 seems to fix the problem. Thanks! (I assume 0.67_01 became 0.68.)


This service is sponsored and maintained by Best Practical Solutions and runs on Perl.org infrastructure.

Please report any issues with rt.cpan.org to rt-cpan-admin@bestpractical.com.