Skip Menu |
 

This queue is for tickets about the RHP-Timer CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 56070
Status: open
Priority: 0/
Queue: RHP-Timer

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: SREZIC [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: 0.1



Subject: Random test results
Download (untitled) / with headers
text/plain 384b
Looking at the results on the CPAN testers matrix <http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=RHP-Timer&maxver=> it happens quite often that the test fails because of an error in the form # Failed test 'precise to 0.005 seconds' # at t/RHP-Timer.t line 29. # '0.0279199999999999' # < # '0.005' # Looks like you failed 1 test of 12. t/RHP-Timer.t .. Regards, Slaven
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #56070] Random test results
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:46:46 -0700
To: bug-RHP-Timer [...] rt.cpan.org
From: Fred Moyer <fred [...] redhotpenguin.com>
Download (untitled) / with headers
text/plain 993b
Yeah that's a poor test. This was my first module to go onto CPAN. Ping me if you want to be a maintainer. On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Slaven_Rezic via RT <bug-RHP-Timer@rt.cpan.org> wrote: Show quoted text
> Mon Mar 29 14:43:12 2010: Request 56070 was acted upon. > Transaction: Ticket created by SREZIC >       Queue: RHP-Timer >     Subject: Random test results >   Broken in: (no value) >    Severity: (no value) >       Owner: Nobody >  Requestors: SREZIC@cpan.org >      Status: new >  Ticket <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=56070 > > > > Looking at the results on the CPAN testers matrix > <http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=RHP-Timer&maxver=> it happens quite > often that the test fails because of an error in the form > > #   Failed test 'precise to 0.005 seconds' > #   at t/RHP-Timer.t line 29. > #     '0.0279199999999999' > #         < > #     '0.005' > # Looks like you failed 1 test of 12. > t/RHP-Timer.t .. > > Regards, >    Slaven > >
Download (untitled) / with headers
text/plain 472b
On Mon Mar 29 14:46:58 2010, fred@redhotpenguin.com wrote: Show quoted text
> Yeah that's a poor test. This was my first module to go onto CPAN. > > Ping me if you want to be a maintainer. >
I just stumbled over it when doing a mass test over all CPAN modules to compare perl 5.10.1 and 5.12.0-RC0. First time the test had a PASS with 5.10.1 and a FAIL with 5.12.0-RC0, so the module came into my list as a possible regression candidate, and I took a closer look. Regards, Slaven


This service is sponsored and maintained by Best Practical Solutions and runs on Perl.org infrastructure.

Please report any issues with rt.cpan.org to rt-cpan-admin@bestpractical.com.