Skip Menu |
 

This queue is for tickets about the PostScript CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 32319
Status: open
Priority: 0/
Queue: PostScript

People
Owner: Nobody in particular
Requestors: d.paleino [...] gmail.com
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: Important
Broken in: 0.06
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: Missing copyright information
Download (untitled) / with headers
text/plain 571b
Hi, I'm packaging PostScript for the Debian GNU/Linux distribution. I've encountered some problems in your module; in fact, Document.pm and TextBlock.pm are missing any copyright information. I assume that they are distributed under the same license as Perl (GPL + Artistic), but to avoid any rejection from Debian repositories, it would be better if you specify it. You can make a new release, or, better, just state what the license is in this bugreport. It will be referenced in case of rejection from the repositories. Have a nice day, David Paleino Debian Perl Team
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #32319] Missing copyright information
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:32:26 -0500 (EST)
To: David Paleino via RT <bug-PostScript [...] rt.cpan.org>
From: Shawn Wallace <shawn [...] as220.org>
Download (untitled) / with headers
text/plain 1.2k
Hi there: That's correct: Document.pm and TextBlock.pm are both distributed under the same terms as Perl (GPL+Artistic). Let me know if you need more information --Shawn On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, David Paleino via RT wrote: Show quoted text
> > Tue Jan 15 02:56:42 2008: Request 32319 was acted upon. > Transaction: Ticket created by d.paleino@gmail.com > Queue: PostScript > Subject: Missing copyright information > Broken in: 0.06 > Severity: Important > Owner: Nobody > Requestors: d.paleino@gmail.com > Status: new > Ticket <URL: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=32319 > > > > Hi, > I'm packaging PostScript for the Debian GNU/Linux distribution. I've > encountered some problems in your module; in fact, Document.pm and > TextBlock.pm are missing any copyright information. I assume that they > are distributed under the same license as Perl (GPL + Artistic), but to > avoid any rejection from Debian repositories, it would be better if you > specify it. You can make a new release, or, better, just state what the > license is in this bugreport. It will be referenced in case of rejection > from the repositories. > > Have a nice day, > David Paleino > Debian Perl Team >
-- S h a w n P W a l l a c e http://www.as220.org/shawn/ 115 Empire St Providence RI
From: d.paleino [...] gmail.com
Download (untitled) / with headers
text/plain 416b
On Mar. 15 Gen. 2008 08:32:50, SHAWNPW wrote: Show quoted text
> > Hi there: > > That's correct: Document.pm and TextBlock.pm are both distributed under > the same terms as Perl (GPL+Artistic). Let me know if you need more > information
That should be sufficient. I'll inform other team members about your statement, and hopefully the package libpostscript-perl will soon be available on Debian GNU/Linux systems! Kindly, David


This service is sponsored and maintained by Best Practical Solutions and runs on Perl.org infrastructure.

Please report any issues with rt.cpan.org to rt-cpan-admin@bestpractical.com.