Skip Menu |
 

This queue is for tickets about the CPANPLUS CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 124799
Status: patched
Worked: 1 hour (60 min)
Priority: 0/
Queue: CPANPLUS

People
Owner: BINGOS [...] cpan.org
Requestors: ANDK [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: Wishlist
Broken in: 0.9172
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: Reports do not reflect whether Makefile.PL od Build.PL was used
Download (untitled) / with headers
text/plain 445b
(marking as severity wishlist) As per subject. Distros with both Makefile.PL and Build.PL show up regularly and quite often one works better than the other. Yesterday I wrote this bugreport that illustrates such a case: https://github.com/cv-library/Test2-Tools-xUnit/issues/1 Sample report from CPANPLUS 0.9172: http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/93187255 No hint whether MakeMaker or Module::Build was used. Or am I missing something?
Download (untitled) / with headers
text/plain 389b
On Sat Mar 17 01:57:47 2018, ANDK wrote: Show quoted text
> No hint whether MakeMaker or Module::Build was used. Or am I missing > something?
You aren't missing something, it wasn't there :) I have updated CPANPLUS::YACSmoke to add whether CPANPLUS is preferring Makefile.PL or Build.PL to the test reports. https://github.com/bingos/cpanplus-yacsmoke/commit/febb08979bab5cbed473d14e36377345f6d3f4ee


This service is sponsored and maintained by Best Practical Solutions and runs on Perl.org infrastructure.

Please report any issues with rt.cpan.org to rt-cpan-admin@bestpractical.com.