This queue is for tickets about the namespace-clean CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id:
121046
Status:
rejected
Priority:
Low/Low

People
Owner:
Nobody in particular
Requestors:
jkeenan [...] cpan.org
Cc:
AdminCc:

BugTracker
Severity:
(no value)
Broken in:
(no value)
Fixed in:
(no value)



Subject: Dependency on CPAN module which is not yet no-dot-in-@INC-compliant
Today I attempted to assess the perl-5.26.0-readiness of this distribution. Included in that assessment is testing the distribution and its prerequisites for the absence of '.' by default in @INC. This distribution has dependencies on both Package::Stash and B::Hooks::EndOfScope, which in turn have dependencies on distributions which are not perl-5.26.0-compliant. For example, Package-Stash has a dependency on Dist-CheckConflicts, which in turn has a dependency on Module-Runtime, which is not yet 5.26-0-compliant. See: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=118768 Thank you very much. Jim Keenan
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #121046] Dependency on CPAN module which is not yet no-dot-in-@INC-compliant
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:57:18 +0200
To: bug-namespace-clean@rt.cpan.org
From: Peter Rabbitson <perl@leporine.io>
On 04/10/2017 03:19 AM, James E Keenan via RT wrote:
Show quoted text
> > Today I attempted to assess the perl-5.26.0-readiness of this distribution. Included in that assessment is testing the distribution and its prerequisites for the absence of '.' by default in @INC. > > This distribution has dependencies on both Package::Stash and B::Hooks::EndOfScope, which in turn have dependencies on distributions which are not perl-5.26.0-compliant. For example, Package-Stash has a dependency on Dist-CheckConflicts, which in turn has a dependency on Module-Runtime, which is not yet 5.26-0-compliant. See: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=118768 >
I am confused. What are the maintainers of namespace::clean expected to do with the above information?
No response from submitter, and nothing seemingly-actionable. Marking as rejected. Please feel free to reopen if I missed something obvious. Cheers
On Fri Apr 14 13:11:30 2017, RIBASUSHI wrote:
Show quoted text
> No response from submitter, and nothing seemingly-actionable. >
Hmm, for some reason rt.cpan.org didn't send me a copy of your April 10 post.
Show quoted text
> Marking as rejected. >
That's fine. I embarked on this before I realized that it would indeed offer maintainers little to do except to contact the maintainers of the modules which they depend on to encourage corrections.
Show quoted text
> Please feel free to reopen if I missed something obvious. > > Cheers
Thanks for responding! Jim Keenan


This service runs on Request Tracker, is sponsored by The Perl Foundation, and maintained by Best Practical Solutions.

Please report any issues with rt.cpan.org to rt-cpan-admin@bestpractical.com.