Skip Menu |
 

This queue is for tickets about the IPTables-Rule CPAN distribution.

Report information
The Basics
Id: 115865
Status: resolved
Priority: 0/
Queue: IPTables-Rule

People
Owner: fukawi2 [...] gmail.com
Requestors: rest [...] xicon.de
Cc:
AdminCc:

Bug Information
Severity: (no value)
Broken in: (no value)
Fixed in: (no value)



Subject: Undefined subroutine &IPTables::Rule::is_valid_inet_cidr called at IPTables/Rule.pm line 479/487
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 21:16:15 +0200
To: bug-IPTables-Rule [...] rt.cpan.org
From: XiconRest <rest [...] xicon.de>
Download (untitled) / with headers
text/plain 177b
Dear IPTables::Rule maintainer, it looks like there is function name miss-used: is_valid_inet_cidr should be __is_valid_inet_cidr. Patch is attached. Best regards xiconfjs

Message body is not shown because sender requested not to inline it.

Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #115865] Undefined subroutine &IPTables::Rule::is_valid_inet_cidr called at IPTables/Rule.pm line 479/487
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 00:16:44 +0200
To: bug-IPTables-Rule [...] rt.cpan.org
From: XiconRest <rest [...] xicon.de>
Download (untitled) / with headers
text/plain 344b
Am 04.07.16 um 21:16 schrieb Bugs in IPTables-Rule via RT: Show quoted text
> it looks like there is function name miss-used: is_valid_inet_cidr > should be __is_valid_inet_cidr. > > Patch is attached.
I'm sorry, the first created and attached patch file is generated the wrong way. Here is the corrected one attached. Thanks and best regards xiconfjs

Message body is not shown because sender requested not to inline it.



This service is sponsored and maintained by Best Practical Solutions and runs on Perl.org infrastructure.

Please report any issues with rt.cpan.org to rt-cpan-admin@bestpractical.com.